Forum Member Dilemma

[effe]

Originally Posted by egri

Looking at the pictures of Andrew holding the Wagner, does anyone else see a gap between his thumb and the slab? If he had actually been holding it that way, he would've dropped it.

He probably hadn't used the paper towels at that point and it just stuck there.

[ALBB]

Come back on probation

[Tabe]

I don't have an opinion on banning either way - I'm just baffled anybody could think that was a crack in the slab. It seems obvious from the photos and you can see the tape hanging over and surely it would FEEL different than...plastic?

[frankbmd]

Originally Posted by Tabe

I don't have an opinion on banning either way - I'm just baffled anybody could think that was a crack in the slab. It seems obvious from the photos and you can see the tape hanging over and surely it would FEEL different than...plastic?

Maybe he’s just not comfortable feeling cracks.

[RCMcKenzie]

I would vote for D, None of my business, but I voted B, No, because I've been on here since Yoda's board, and Bobby Strawberry is one of the few people that has ever agreed with one of my takes, I think it was in the Doncic card thread. Anyway, good luck, it looks like the tribe has spoken. To me, OJ's don't need to be graded, I don't see what purpose it serves, you look at the photo.

[Mark17]

I have used fake names on websites I didn't originally plan to spend much time with - and I would call it an "alias" rather than a fake name. So that is plausible to me. I use Norton, and one of the websites I signed up with was hacked and my password used for that site is exposed. Fortunately for me, I use a different password for every site I sign up with, but some people don't. Anyway, it makes me tread cautiously when I want to explore a site new to me and right away I'm being asked a bunch of identifying questions.

Having said that, I fully understand why Leon needs to do this. And I wouldn't do deals with people without using my real name.

So... the registration issue is not something I'd hold against him, given his several problem-free transactions and the fact he later provided his real name.

The tape/crack is also a non-issue to me. Mistakes happen and no fraud or hint of it occurred. I'd let him stay.

[Oscar_Stanage]

I do not think this person should be banned.

[Gorditadogg]

Originally Posted by RCMcKenzie

I would vote for D, None of my business, but I voted B, No, because I've been on here since Yoda's board, and Bobby Strawberry is one of the few people that has ever agreed with one of my takes, I think it was in the Doncic card thread. Anyway, good luck, it looks like the tribe has spoken. To me, OJ's don't need to be graded, I don't see what purpose it serves, you look at the photo.

Yes, you and Bobby are both lucky you weren't banned for your awful Luka hot takes. Good thing this isn't a basketball forum.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

[BobbyStrawberry]

Originally Posted by Gorditadogg

Yes, you and Bobby are both lucky you weren't banned for your awful Luka hot takes. Good thing this isn't a basketball forum.

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Hey Al, what was it in the Luka thread that you are remembering? My comments were mostly pushing back against Snowman's assertion that "Luka is the best young player in the league, and it's not close" which I still think is an absurd take.

[earlywynnfan]

Originally Posted by effe

He probably hadn't used the paper towels at that point and it just stuck there.

OK, that was funny!:

[Luke]

Just sounds like a new collector being overly cautious. If he buys the card again and adds $20 or whatever to cover shipping, I'd say all is forgiven.