![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ted, my view is (1) the 150 backs for these three variation cards exist on the original versions of the cards showing their former teams, and (2) some 150-350 subjects -- i.e., these three -- aren't found with 150 backs, just as the cards from the 150-only series aren't found with 350 backs.
It also is worth nothing that G. Brown (Chicago) is part of the 150-only series, unlike Dahlen (Boston) and Elberfeld portrait (N.Y.). But as I think we've established, a lot of this is just theory. The cards weren't issued with a checklist or a printing schedule. The mystery and the mystique are part of what makes the Monster so much fun to collect, talk about, and even vigorously debate! ![]() Per Dahlen Brooklyn, it looks like you and Pat might have a disagreement on facts. I previously wasn't aware of either (1) what Pat said above in post #24, or (2) what you said above in post #31 regarding the notation being found on cards across the five series. I'm not in a position yet to draw a conclusion on this question. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Know the No-Prints of the EPDG cards in the 150 Series of the T206 set...... | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 25 | 03-18-2022 07:04 AM |
Interesting NO-PRINT group of T206 Carolina Brights - EPDG - Old Mill - Polar Bear | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 01-23-2019 06:41 PM |
T206....PIEDMONT vs EPDG cards in 350 series and 460 series | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 10-07-2017 10:38 PM |
FS: group of 6 EPDG commons | trobba | T206 cards B/S/T | 0 | 10-22-2014 10:00 AM |
T206 Brown OLD MILL's....Prints vs No-Prints | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 05-27-2010 09:39 AM |