|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Correct, one has fine mesh and one has wide mesh.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
So, are DPs with differences variations or just two versions of a card ?
Are all of the 68 baseball MB cards variations, or just a second set or separate subset of the 68 Topps set ? |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Until I met Carlton (pre net54), I considered MB cards variations. After he explained the nuances of this set to me, the MB set is most certainly it's own set independent of all other sets(IE. not a subset ). |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
I tend to agree with you Larry on both counts.
But if one adopts the limited definition of a variation as a card intentionally changed by the manufacturer are double prints in a set, like the 52 Mantle, Thompson and Robinson variations ( or the many checklist DPs of the 60s and 70s) ? The differences were not specifically intentional but did result from intentional decisions in the set up of the sheet. Are the 62 greenies that did not involve pose differences variations ? How about the 82 Blackless "set " They are just unintentional print defects but ended up in packs. Variations ? SCD listed them as a separate set I tend to view DP differences as variations. The greenies also. But I tend to view the 82 Blackless as print defects, although clearly they are recognized by the hobby as either variations or a separate subset of the 82 Topps. Also agree that each collector should make their own call Last edited by ALR-bishop; 11-22-2022 at 10:35 AM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Marichal checklist was printed in double quantity, with 2 spots on the sheet. One with each variation of it. Just as the 311 Mantle is a DP with a variation, so too is the MB checklist. That it has a variation does not make it not a double print. A DP with a variation has never normally been considered an entirely new card, just a card that has a variation. The card is a double print.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Last edited by savedfrommyspokes; 11-22-2022 at 12:45 PM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I guess I find myself more in Greg's camp on this. Like the 52 Mantle, Thompson and Robinson the CL was printed twice on the same sheet and has differences and hence, to me, are variations. But I need both to have a complete "master" set.
I know Carlton, whose views I highly respect....and yours as well...differ from mine, and that's fine by me |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Topps 1968 Milton Bradley set | ALR-bishop | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 119 | 08-24-2016 11:05 AM |
| F/S 1968 Topps Milton Bradley Baseball | kickstand19 | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 05-12-2016 01:13 AM |
| 1968 Topps Milton Bradley question | 4reals | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 04-09-2013 08:31 PM |
| WTB Topps 1968 Milton Bradley... | ALR-bishop | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-02-2012 09:54 AM |
| 1968 Topps / Milton Bradley cards | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 12-25-2007 12:47 PM |