Baseball Hall of Fame Rookie Cards Discussion

[BobC]

.

[Mark17]

Originally Posted by BobC

.

Bob, this is by far the most succinct comment you've ever posted.

[BobC]

Originally Posted by Mark17

Bob, this is by far the most succinct comment you've ever posted.

I enjoy being made fun of because of a glitch in the forum that at times double posts something when I hit the submit button, so go back and edit it out. I'll just leave it as it was from now on!

[bcbgcbrcb]

Bob:

I am fine with all of the foreign issues that I mentioned being potential rookie cards, no difference what level the team was, as you stated, that cannot really be determined anyway. I was simply trying to point out that most all of the players pictured were on significant teams of the era, no intention to single out which teams/leagues were and were not significant, just trying to make a generalization.

[BobC]

Originally Posted by bcbgcbrcb

Bob:

I am fine with all of the foreign issues that I mentioned being potential rookie cards, no difference what level the team was, as you stated, that cannot really be determined anyway. I was simply trying to point out that most all of the players pictured were on significant teams of the era, no intention to single out which teams/leagues were and were not significant, just trying to make a generalization.

I get it. It just sounded at first like it might make a difference to you as to which foreign league a person played in as to whether or not you might consider that foreign card as possibly being that person's rookie card then. You're good with foreign issues being considered rookie cards, that is cool. Many others will say no. It's all good, to each his own. Your site and the work you put in on it is great, and you include multiple cards/items and things like these foreign cards, so collectors can pick and choose what makes sense to them. This is super!