|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don’t think it’s newly graded. While I am no PSA expert, I am pretty sure it’s a very old cert#; I just think it’s been reholdered. In my experience, PSA certs that start with 0, 3, and 9, are old and often overgraded compared to others.
Last edited by Rhotchkiss; 04-02-2023 at 02:01 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Over, and solely over due to who the auction house is.
Last edited by parkplace33; 04-02-2023 at 01:58 PM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Has nothing to do with the strength of the pre-war sector.....apples and oranges.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think we've discussed in a few of the trimming threads (and others where people ask), that PSA certs did not go in numerical order, until they started picking up around 20 years ago and then filling in all the certs that were never issued. So while some 30,xxx,xxx certs (and 50M, 90M) were graded 20+ years ago, the vast majority of 30M certs were graded 5-6 years ago, and the 50M that weren't ancient were graded during the COVID boom. PSA hasn't gotten to 90M yet, so all those are ancient. This one starting with 03 is definitely ancient and reholdered.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That said I vote $200-$250k for some reason...
__________________
Successful B/S/T deals with asoriano, obcbobd, x2dRich2000, eyecollectvintage, RepublicaninMass, Kwikford, Oneofthree67, jfkheat, scottglevy, whitehse, GoldenAge50s, Peter Spaeth, Northviewcats, megalimey, BenitoMcNamara, Edwolf1963, mightyq, sidepocket, darwinbulldog, jasonc, jessejames, sb1, rjackson44, bobbyw8469, quinnsryche, Carter08, philliesfan and ALBB, Buythatcard and JimmyC so far. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
The interest in a $350K card is about as relevant to the overall health of the hobby as the price of a custom mansion on the beach is to prices for tract homes 100 miles inland. The decision-making processes of a tiny group of collectors who are wealthy enough to contemplate buying a $350,000 card do not have anything to do with 99.99% of collectors. These super-expensive card buyers are basically non-responsive to economic tides due to their extreme wealth.
A better gauge for hobby health is to look at the passed lot percentages in the run of the mill auctions. They are still extraordinarily low by historical standards. Last week's Sterling Auction had 501 lots with ten passed lots. REA's March 19 auction had one passed lot. That indicates a very active buying public is still engaged heavily with the hobby and buying basically whatever is out there. Prices may be stagnant or falling on some classes of items but interest is still sky-high.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 04-02-2023 at 08:22 PM. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Unda
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
It will sell way over $350,000 setting a new record high. This seems to be a new normal commonplace in Major Auction Houses on High-Grade Cards Specifically PSA 9 HOF Rookies.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ova
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm going over. Him and Mays are the last two baseball gods from that era.
Goldin will be blasting it all over social media I bet. What a card! |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Unless I'm mistaken, a passed lot is merely a lot that didn't get any bids. I suppose part of the fun there is where the auction house puts the initial bid, and whether that's an attractive price point. But even if just one person bids, then the item wouldn't fail, right? I suppose it's also possible that if the item has a reserve that isn't met, then that might count as a passed lot. Part of me also wonders whether a big part of the calculus here is the question of whether the auction house is deliberately turning away relatively worthless pieces (maybe a 1988 Donruss common in BVG 6 as an example) such that they never get to auction, and therefore never have a chance to fail because no one will bid the minimum $10 on them.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
No idea on price, but that's an insane card
__________________
~20 SUCCESSFUL BST (1 trade) on Net54 |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel Last edited by raulus; 04-03-2023 at 01:28 PM. |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Under. By 10-20%.
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Whoever is buying this card is either doing so purely as investment, is a super wealthy collector who we must assume has the financial cognizance to know if they are making a poor financial decision, or some degree of both. In other words, the bidders on a high-grade, high-profile, expensive card like this is, and know they are, making a financial decision when they decide to place a bid they hope wins the auction. This is not a T206 Wagner, BN Ruth, Just So Young or something super rare -- this is a full commodity card. I think the hammer price on high-end commodity cards are very relevant to values across the asset class/industry. Last edited by Rhotchkiss; 04-04-2023 at 02:19 PM. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am with Adam on this one. There is probably 1/2 of 1 percent of collectors on this forum, most likely less, that can afford a card like that. I am much more interested in T206 Red Cobbs and Goudey Ruth 144s, in medium conditions, as far as the health of the pre war market.
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 04-04-2023 at 07:59 PM. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Looking at the REA scans, that card if resubmitted today would probably grade an 8 at best.
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
I haven't taken selling serious in a very long time. When are the closing dates? I know years ago if the closing dates are close the one that finished first always sold for more on similar items.
|
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I just don't buy the 'trickle down' view of card prices.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
As you noted, only a very extremely small percentage of members on Net54, let alone in the hobby community itself, would ever be able to afford to be paying that kind of money for any card/collection. I know I can't afford that kind of money, and am perfectly happy with the lower grade '55 Topps Koufax card(s) I have had for years. A Collector is happy to have a nice version of a card they want, and isn't necessarily worried about it being this or that grade. Would it be nice to have a NM 7 version of a card as opposed to say a VG-EX 4 version, well of course, but a Collector would likely be most happy just to have a nice version of that card, period. An Investor, on the other hand, isn't necessarily worried about having this or that particular card, just one that they think they can make a lot of money off of buying, holding, and then later reselling it for a profit. The fact that card shows are making a comeback after the pandemic, attendance is up and great, the hobby is all over the internet and making a splash, seems to show the hobby is alive and doing well. As long as baseball is still around and followed and watched by so many people, I think the hobby itself will be fine, and there will always be Collectors keeping it alive and healthy. Now as for the Investors, that may be a different story. If these high-priced card prices start tanking, and the Investors start getting out, I think that would actually be even better for the Collectors in the hobby as all of these much desired cards will start to become more affordable and available to the everyday, true Collectors. As soon as you start trying to tie and equate hobby prices to hobby health, you aren't really talking about a hobby anymore, you're talking about an investment industry choice. And to stay on topic for the OP's question, I think under. Last edited by BobC; 04-06-2023 at 05:10 PM. |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yet the rising tide lifts all boats.
Honestly...
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
|
#23
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Doing well over here! Currently on a 60 day vacation between things. Giving me a chance to thin the herd of doubles! Very much needed to do it!! Hope you're well, too!! |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 1955 Topps Koufax SGC 3+1955 Topps Jackie Robinson SGC 4 | JayZim13 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 3 | 06-13-2021 04:34 PM |
| FS 1955 Topps Koufax PSA 5 | Kelleys1 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 04-20-2020 08:29 PM |
| OT/ The Health of the Hobby | frankbmd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-10-2018 11:59 AM |
| REA bids - health of the hobby | ajjohnsonsoxfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 85 | 04-20-2016 07:55 AM |
| Will HEALTH CARE REFORM hurt hobby? | joeadcock | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 03-29-2010 09:28 AM |