|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think the reason is that to make a great fake you'd need an original as source material.
And it's become so expensive that it just hasn't happened. It would be worth it to make one nearly perfect one. maybe a bit off, so it's not suspicious, but around a 7-8. what it would take is out of reach for most fakers. Someone smart would only do that once. Maybe with a handful of other 52 high numbers to avert suspicion. Two? It would start getting looked at more closely. Three? Just asking for trouble. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I could see some of the more sinister elements of our hobby deciding to go scorched earth and create millions of really good 52T fakes. If done properly, it could throw the entire hobby in disarray for a while, at least until we figured out some way to reliably distinguish the fakes from the real deal.
__________________
Trying to wrap up my master mays set, with just a few left: 1968 American Oil left side 1971 Bazooka numbered complete panel |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Up to $12k!
Seller says he will put the card in a toploader for shipment LOL. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not to mention, couldn’t your model (for example) just be a common ‘52 Topps card and not the Mantle? Maybe not, I don’t know but either way having one to produce profit on many doesn’t seem to me something that would stand in the way for long. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Cubs of all eras. Currently working on 1956, '63 and '72 Topps complete sets. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
The problem most fakers have is that they're mostly lazy. The effort to get a top quality fake is a lot but the reward would be too. On the other hand, using a cheap fake takes no effort, and apparently gets you thousands. It's also in the range of just refunding if it gets caught, and a couple thousand probably won't be investigated. Because at that point "I didn't know" just might be all you need. A couple million or more might cause the faker a lot more trouble. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
whoops, nevermind.
__________________
~20 SUCCESSFUL BST (1 trade) on Net54 Last edited by luciobar1980; 12-21-2023 at 08:45 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1952 Bowman Mantle...this current bidding can't be real, can it? | thatkidfromjerrymaguire | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 45 | 02-28-2021 08:31 AM |
| 1952 Topps Preacher Roe #66 - Real or Reprint?? | weilervintage | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 4 | 02-04-2016 03:43 PM |
| ***REPRINT*** 1952 topps mantle, old, looks feels real | soxfan1986 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 20 | 12-21-2013 11:06 PM |
| 1952 Topps Mantle Real???? | Tcards-Please | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 03-14-2010 12:27 AM |
| 1952 Topps Mantle REAL? | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 11-30-2008 04:10 AM |