Final UPDATE. PSA Guarantee on a doctored card - Actual good news this time

[Snowman]

It also looks like it was even cleaned while still inside the original PSA 3 cert's slab (see first image comparison below). This is getting interesting now!

...

[TiffanyCards]

Originally Posted by Snowman

It almost makes me wonder if a less biased comparison might be the second image below?

The images I used all come from PSA. I doubt PSA is image bias.

Let’s stay focused on getting a sticker for this card.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Snowman]

Originally Posted by TiffanyCards

The images I used all come from PSA. I doubt PSA is image bias.

Another lie. You know damn well that PSA's images are garbage. Admit it, you first saw the images from the bottom row of my comparison collage above (the images which accurately represent the card), but those weren't good enough for you, so you went to the PSA website to see if you could dig up some worse images that might better fit your narrative.

[G1911]

Originally Posted by Snowman

Another lie. You know damn well that PSA's images are garbage. Admit it, you first saw the images from the bottom row of my comparison collage above (the images which accurately represent the card), but those weren't good enough for you, so you went to the PSA website to see if you could dig up some worse images that might better fit your narrative.

It would help your case and credibility if you would stop blatantly lying about things that do not even matter, like having the card for sale. When you just openly lie in ways that are really, really easy to prove in 10 seconds about things that don't even matter, it is impossible to seem honest or take any accusations of dishonesty you make about anyone else seriously. You are the poster child for dishonesty and lying when you keep provably lying all the damn time lol.

[Snowman]

Originally Posted by G1911

It would help your case and credibility if you would stop blatantly lying about things that do not even matter, like having the card for sale. When you just openly lie in ways that are really, really easy to prove in 10 seconds about things that don't even matter, it is impossible to seem honest or take any accusations of dishonesty you make about anyone else seriously. You are the poster child for dishonesty and lying when you keep provably lying all the damn time lol.

The card is listed on ebay for many multiples of what it is worth. Nobody is going to pay the listed price for it, nor the previously listed price, nor anything remotely near it. I have zero intentions of selling it. It is there for show & tell. It might be my favorite card in my entire collection. This is not a difficult concept to grasp. PSA 3s go for between $6k to $10k. This one was listed for $30k which I changed to $100k in case there was any confusion about it actually being "for sale". It's listed on ebay, yet it is not "for sale". If you can't understand that concept, then I don't know what to tell you.

[TiffanyCards]

Originally Posted by Snowman

Another lie. You know damn well that PSA's images are garbage. Admit it, you first saw the images from the bottom row of my comparison collage above (the images which accurately represent the card), but those weren't good enough for you, so you went to the PSA website to see if you could dig up some worse images that might better fit your narrative.

I’m not sure what you are even talking about. You seem to be flailing all over the place. When would I have seen your image collage?? At least we agree that they are in fact the same card. If you want, then I would be happy to discuss the differences I pointed out in the images with you. In not a single post did I mention anything about bleaching. Who is attacking you or manipulating images?? I never said this was your card.

Even if we use your images from your collage, you can clearly see the stain on the top right border is no longer present on the cert 76513639. Where did the stain go??? The stain has been removed. Which is why this card was added to the altered card database.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Snowman]

Originally Posted by TiffanyCards

I’m not sure what you are even talking about. You seem to be flailing all over the place. When would I have seen your image collage?? At least we agree that they are in fact the same card. If you want, then I would be happy to discuss the differences I pointed out in the images with you. In not a single post did I mention anything about bleaching. Who is attacking you or manipulating images?? I never said this was your card.

Even if we use your images from your collage, you can clearly see the stain on the top right border is no longer present on the cert 76513639. Where did the stain go??? The stain has been removed. Which is why this card was added to the altered card database.

Here you go again with your disingenuous deceptive bullshit. Just admit that you intentionally chose the washed-out-looking PSA scan and the dirty looking prior PSA scan instead of the PWCC scan because they were a better fit for your agenda and it make it appear as though the card has been chemically bleached when it in fact has not.

[TiffanyCards]

Originally Posted by Snowman

Here you go again with your disingenuous deceptive bullshit. Just admit that you intentionally chose the washed-out-looking PSA scan and the dirty looking prior PSA scan instead of the PWCC scan because they were a better fit for your agenda and it make it appear as though the card has been chemically bleached when it in fact has not.

When asked by Peter_Spaeth "So Travis bought it already cleaned?" you replied, "Yes, that is correct." So you acknowledge that the card has been cleaned. Why are you continuing with the false narrative that the images are manipulated?? If you have a problem with PSA images, then take it up with them. Again your own images show the stain had been removed from the card.

Now, please get back on the topic of labeling cards that are on the altered card database. Let's see your mock up!

[Carter08]

Just trying to catch up on this one and apologize for not going through everything. Is the dispute over whether the Jackie currently has that discoloration in the upper right or whether its removal constitutes alteration or something else?

[Snowman]

Originally Posted by TiffanyCards

Now, please get back on the topic of labeling cards that are on the altered card database. Let's see your mock up!

Excellent! Now that you've accurately represented the card, perhaps we should discuss what is and is not an alteration since you claim to be maintaining a database of "altered" cards. As we all know, soaking a vintage card in water and letting it dry is not an alteration. So why is this card in your database again?

[Snowman]

Originally Posted by TiffanyCards

Let’s stay focused on getting a sticker for this card.

I've asked you 4 times if I have your permission to put stickers on cards with your logo. You dodged the question all 4 times. This is the last time I'll ask. Do I have your permission to put stickers on cards using your logo?

[TiffanyCards]

Originally Posted by Snowman

I've asked you 4 times if I have your permission to put stickers on cards with your logo. You dodged the question all 4 times. This is the last time I'll ask. Do I have your permission to put stickers on cards using your logo?

Let’s start with the Jackie listed on eBay. Put your mock design sticker on it. If I approve, then I will give you permission to use it on your other cards. I won’t even charge you a royalty.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk