M101-1 at PSA?!

Jay Wolt · #1 10-13-2024, 08:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon

So the solution to getting them slabbed is trimming them.

.

Or use Beckett
PSA & SGC apparently has no slab that large

Beercan collector · #2 10-16-2024, 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay Wolt

Or use Beckett
PSA & SGC apparently has no slab that large

So Beckett can do it but PSA cannot (?) WTFudge

dbsports417 · #3 09-11-2025, 05:06 PM

Since Beckett has some of these listed on their submission platform, I assumed they knew enough about these to grade them. I sent 13 of them in to have slabbed only to have them returned as "Questionable Authenticity". After receiving my submissions back and asking to as why the issue, their response was that, "since so few exists, not enough has been known about this set to be able to authenticate". After seeing a couple of Wagners and a few other commons graded, I assumed they knew enough about them to be able to grade and slab them. They did not appear that they were even taken out of the holders that I sent and had sandwiched them in and taped together to allow easy removal. They also stated in their response that they are not officially classifying them as "fake" but that they still have not seen enough examples to accurately authenticate. Meanwhile, I am out over $600 for the submissions and an explanation that they do not issue refunds. Had I known their lack of knowledge of these items, I would have only sent one or two for submission, so I would have only shelled out $100 or so.

tiger8mush · #4 09-11-2025, 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbsports417

Since Beckett has some of these listed on their submission platform, I assumed they knew enough about these to grade them. I sent 13 of them in to have slabbed only to have them returned as "Questionable Authenticity". After receiving my submissions back and asking to as why the issue, their response was that, "since so few exists, not enough has been known about this set to be able to authenticate". After seeing a couple of Wagners and a few other commons graded, I assumed they knew enough about them to be able to grade and slab them. They did not appear that they were even taken out of the holders that I sent and had sandwiched them in and taped together to allow easy removal. They also stated in their response that they are not officially classifying them as "fake" but that they still have not seen enough examples to accurately authenticate. Meanwhile, I am out over $600 for the submissions and an explanation that they do not issue refunds. Had I known their lack of knowledge of these items, I would have only sent one or two for submission, so I would have only shelled out $100 or so.

Agreed, that's a lame excuse for them to take the full $600 and not even look at the full group. You should get at least a partial, if not full, refund. Continue calling them until you get a better result, because like you said, they have authenticated some so why not yours, unless yours truly are questionable but then I'd want a reason why?

doug.goodman · #5 09-11-2025, 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dbsports417

Since Beckett ... stated in their response that they are not officially classifying them as "fake" but that they still have not seen enough examples to accurately authenticate ...

So their official response to your submission was "we do not have the expertise needed to determine their authenticity or not but thank you for paying us for the expertise we sold you (which we do not have)."

Gotta love the opinion sellers.

Doug "but do you really?" Goodman

bcbgcbrcb · #6 09-11-2025, 09:03 PM

As someone who probably submitted more of these than anyone else around the 2010 time frame, I can state with pretty strong certainty that the level of grading knowledge and expertise at Beckett back then far exceeded the new hires that enter the card grading world seemingly every day. There weren’t too many paper collectibles that Mark Anderson and Andy Broome were not intimately familiar with. And, to top it all off, they even had the oversize holders needed to slab M101-1’s not trimmed.

I cannot speak for who Beckett has on staff today, I haven’t submitted an item for grading to them in more than a decade. Apparently, they are at least not familiar with this issue, likely amongst many others. To me, not even a passing thought to trimming a Wagner down just to fit inside a PSA holder. That would be insane although at one time, I would have definitely considered it. You live and you learn though (hopefully).

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FS - 1916 M101-5 and M101-4 Graded Felsch (FB), Crawford, Merkle, Groh, Schulte	PhillyFan1883	Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T	0	03-25-2023 09:41 PM
FOR SALE 1916 Miller Huggins M101-4 &5 Graded M101-5�s plus 1 Neilson�s Chocolate.	PhillyFan1883	Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T	2	02-09-2019 07:35 PM
Wanted! 1916 m101-4 burgess-nash co. Back needed- collecting both m101 master sets!	PhillyFan1883	Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T	3	01-02-2019 02:11 PM
WTB: 1916 Jim Thorpe Sporting news M101-5, M101-5 blank back, Morehouse, 1922 Zeenut	Reggiejackson563	Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T	0	05-08-2018 07:42 AM
Looking for 1916 m101-4/m101-5 Sporting News Errors, Oddities & Misprints	shammus	Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T	0	06-21-2013 10:56 PM