![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bailey, 485, is below either a RS or Pirate. My initial thpught was Stigman, 512, but I'm not positive.
Also, recall that O'donoghue is below two different cards. Certainly 458, but also a Twin/Red 1966_485_Pitt-Bos.jpg 1966_501_TC_blue.jpg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Covington is below either Angel/Brave and above a Chi
1966_484_miscuts.jpg I have a H pair of 447-459 (Ellsworth-McCool initially thought to be Oliva by changed our mind. still TBD), and a vertical grouping of 515-450-489-447 (Howard-Oliva-Simmons-Ellsworth) And Friend is below an orange card, perhaps Covington?? 1966_519_TC_orange.jpg |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Instead of a Chicago player, it might simply be a color shift and perhaps it is Friend below Covington
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I went back through the thread and spotted a couple that were overlooked. Grady Hatton is above the the Athletics Team card. If Dick Ellsworth is a 4x he has Bill McCool to his right, if he is a 3x he has Tony Oliva to his right. Ellsworth is one of those cards that always has quantities in the gray area for being either a 3x or a 4x. ETA I just noticed that we have Ellsworth and Oliva in the same column so it has to be McCool to the right of Ellsworth. Ellsworth probably is a 4x, it is a notorious card because it pictures Ken Hubbs so the demand for it likely keeps its' quantities down.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” Last edited by Cliff Bowman; 02-05-2025 at 10:10 AM. Reason: Addition |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And this mc of Mcdaniel is below a RS or Pitt. Not sure why, but I had it initially identifed as 456, RS rooks, but I can't recall why
1966_496_TC_RS.jpg |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Might be Azcue below Latman |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cliff showed a blow up of the Latman a day ago or so making it clear Stuart is under Latman.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Azcue has a Rookie Stars card above him.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I came to the conclusion that it is Dick Stigman above Bob Bailey when comparing Stigman to the miscut.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1966 Topps Semi Hi Lot of 36 EX or Better $100.00 Shipped | Lee_Detroit | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 01-28-2019 04:25 PM |
FS: 1966 Topps hi# and semi-hi# lots | jimmysuitcase | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 10-31-2018 09:55 PM |
FS 7 Different 1966 Topps Semi-high Numbers | Northviewcats | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 6 | 12-18-2017 08:13 PM |
1966 Topps Semi-Highs For Sale - EX/MT | Eggoman | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 02-14-2017 07:42 AM |
1966 Topps semi high 6th series | hangman62 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-21-2014 01:09 PM |