New lawsuit accuses PWCC of massive shill bidding

steve B · #1 05-05-2025, 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Section103

There are few things in life I can count on, but a legal discussion on Net54 ~always~ has that "je ne sais quoi" quality.

9:22 is too early to start drinking bourbon and Im mad as hell about it.

It's always noon somewhere

raulus · #2 05-05-2025, 12:19 PM

Bloody double post.

raulus · #3 05-05-2025, 12:19 PM

Circling back to something in this complaint that I'm still not sure that I follow. In terms of the damages side, the notion that the entire market was inflated based on an army of shills has always been an argument that I've struggled to really get behind. I understand the concept behind the market being inflated. I just don't understand why there would be damages.

It's not like someone forced you to buy these cards, or that you were somehow under any obligation to buy them at the offered price. You chose to buy them, and you chose to buy them at a specific price. Whether that price was X or 2X or 10X is kinda your decision to make. Each of us makes a bucketload of decisions at every auction or show to decide when we're ready to tap out, and let something go to someone who's willing to bid more irresponsibly than we are.

Setting aside the shilling aspect, which I agree is wrong for any auctions or items that were indeed shilled, the fact that someone chose to keep bidding until they won, and their level of bidding was based on what they thought the item was worth, which may also in part have been based on what others were paying, the whole thing just seems very contrived to me to suggest that you were harmed by your own decision to keep bidding.

Maybe just to emphasize again, I completely get the idea that shilling destroys the integrity of the auction process, and should never be allowed. But that's a different issue than your experience suffering damages, unless an auction item that you bought was specifically shilled, and therefore the price for that specific item was artificially inflated.

Setting aside the specific shilling issue, either you choose to buy the stuff at the going rate, or you sit it out until you're ready to buy, or you wait patiently (perhaps indefinitely) until the prices come to you. Complaining that you got ripped off seems really bizarre after you made your own independent decision to buy.

And if I'm being honest, it seems a little bit self-indulgent to suggest that you have a right to buy cardboard at a price that you like better than the actual price that you paid.

Peter_Spaeth · #4 05-05-2025, 01:31 PM

Not endorsing it, but the theory is that if shill bidding inflates the price for an auction, it gets reported as a comp which then influences the price of the next sale of the same or similar item.

raulus · #5 05-05-2025, 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Not endorsing it, but the theory is that if shill bidding inflates the price for an auction, it gets reported as a comp which then influences the price of the next sale of the same or similar item.

Fair enough. Maybe to clarify, I get the general theory. I just don�t get the fiction where you ignore that you had a choice to bid at that price and proceeded of your own volition.

Peter_Spaeth · #6 05-05-2025, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus

Fair enough. Maybe to clarify, I get the general theory. I just don�t get the fiction where you ignore that you had a choice to bid at that price and proceeded of your own volition.

Nearly all purchases are voluntary. How does that negate whether the price was driven by fraud? In my example I was "willing" to pay the higher price because I assumed the prior sale honestly reflected the market.

raulus · #7 05-05-2025, 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Nearly all purchases are voluntary. How does that negate whether the price was driven by fraud? In my example I was "willing" to pay the higher price because I assumed the prior sale honestly reflected the market.

I guess that gets back to the role of comps and just how much stock we should put in them. Just because someone else made a stupid decision about how much they were willing to pay doesn't mean that I should be similarly inclined.

But it also gets to trying to shift blame for your own stupid decisions. I tend to take a dim view when it comes to shifting the responsibility for our own actions, particularly when the demand is to be compensated for it.

Edited to add: To some extent, I'll also suggest that viewing cardboard as an investment is a large part of the problem. If you view the cards as something you enjoy, that maybe will hold its value if you're lucky, then your approach to setting a price that works for you is more about what it's worth to you, and less about what you think it will be worth in the future.

Peter_Spaeth · #8 05-05-2025, 02:49 PM

Some people claim that there's a woman to blame
But I know
It's my own damn fault

parkplace33 · #9 05-05-2025, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raulus

I guess that gets back to the role of comps and just how much stock we should put in them. Just because someone else made a stupid decision about how much they were willing to pay doesn't mean that I should be similarly inclined.

But it also gets to trying to shift blame for your own stupid decisions. I tend to take a dim view when it comes to shifting the responsibility for our own actions, particularly when the demand is to be compensated for it.

Edited to add: To some extent, I'll also suggest that viewing cardboard as an investment is a large part of the problem. If you view the cards as something you enjoy, that maybe will hold its value if you're lucky, then your approach to setting a price that works for you is more about what it's worth to you, and less about what you think it will be worth in the future.

Totally agree with you. But the comps value has overtaken the hobby. You go to a card show, you really not negoiating with the dealer, you are negoiating with comps. Same on FB or here, its all about comps.

And the investment piece is the new norm, sadly. I love cards and enjoy cards, but I feel like the ones who actually enjoy these things are getting smaller and smaller.

Aquarian Sports Cards · #10 05-06-2025, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Not endorsing it, but the theory is that if shill bidding inflates the price for an auction, it gets reported as a comp which then influences the price of the next sale of the same or similar item.

But the complainant would also benefit from that as a seller, so that seems a weird argument.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ebay finds that PWCC engaged in shill bidding?	Peter_Spaeth	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	640	11-06-2021 12:03 PM
PWCC Facing Class Action Suit Over Shill Bidding Allegations	DHogan	WaterCooler Talk- Off Topics	1	09-21-2021 04:13 PM
ebay pulls PWCC listings sighting shill bidding PWCC says WHAT is SHILL BIDDING !!!	megalimey	Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk	4	08-18-2021 11:25 AM
It is Sickening how badly PWCC Shill Bids!	danmckee	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	117	07-25-2018 10:39 AM
Shill Bidding	ullmandds	Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions	27	05-11-2016 09:08 PM