|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Another piece that I find interesting is the behind the scenes negation between the seller and AH about getting a piece of that BP. For example, if you were getting 50 percent of the 20 percent before, do you now ask for 50 percent of the 23 percent? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
198/240 1933 Goudeys (Ruth #144, #149, Gehrig #92) 136/208 T205s 47/108? Diamond Stars |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
![]() A prominent guy on a FB group posted that he will not buy from REA anymore with this news. I am sure he won't.... until a huge card appears at the next REA auction. Then all bets are off
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The complaining will end soon enough and they will be back to buying from REA. The real winner is REA they will still get tons of bidders and consigners.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Scott, besides the fact that the antecedents for having a BP are totally irrelevant to today's business, I do not buy any explanation for the commission-BP structure other than it makes the auctioneer more money. If I 'win' a card at REA now, I pay REA the hammer price plus 23%. 123% of the hammer price is the true price of the card. On a $1,000 bid the auction house receives $1,230 from the winning bidder. How the proceeds are chopped up does not change that math. When a middleman (and auctioneers are middlemen between buyer and seller) has two choices of how to do things, a simple one and a more complex one, there is no reason to use the complicated one, other than in the belief that it makes more money for the middleman to do it that way. I've had many negotiations with auctioneers big and small, and they all use the bifurcated structure because they all 'sell' a low or zero commission knowing that the buyer's premium is still going to them.
I am not begrudging an auctioneer the right to make a living, I am expressing a preference for simply admitting that the commission and buyer's premium are one and the same, and dropping the pretense.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 06-16-2025 at 03:51 PM. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Everything is negotiable! I have done auctions for years going back to my Teletrade days when I had numerous employees, and currently with
www.AllSportsAuctions.com where I am the only employee and have NO overhead! When you run the company, you can do anything you want! In my auctions consignors get the best of both worlds---I get very retail prices and I limit the consignor fees to something that makes sense for all parties. Call me and see what I can do! Thanks, Andy Sandler (914) 388-2940 |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lol.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
While you are correct that "how the proceeds are chopped up doesn't change the math" of a buyer's total cost being the hammer price, plus the BP. Your argument seems to ignore the fact that without the BP, the hammer price would be 123% of what it is when there is a 23% BP. In your scenario, the buyer wants to spend $1230 on the card. It makes no difference if there is zero BP and he bids $1230, or there is a 23% BP and he bids $1000. It's incorrect to suggest the bids would be the same with or without the BP. The buyer who doesn't factor the BP into his bids is a small minority. Last edited by OhioLawyerF5; 06-17-2025 at 07:16 AM. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
For the sake of conversation, let's assume extremes to help understand what happens in normal ranges.
If the buyers premium was zero, I believe the buyer would spend the same bottom line. And the consignor would get more because the hammer would be higher. If the buyers premium were 50%, I believe the buyer would still spend the same bottom line. And the consignor would get less because the hammer would be lower. So, as the buyers premium increases, there is probably going to be no affect on what the buyer spends. However, the consignor would get less as BP increases. In a roundabout way, the BP is actually a consignors fee. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Are 1911 D304s increasing in value? | abmchenry | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 12-09-2024 10:53 AM |
| Goldin Increasing Buyer's Premium | jsfriedm | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 184 | 05-24-2024 11:55 PM |
| Making the cut | BeanTown | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-11-2021 02:11 PM |
| A con in the making? | Theoldprofessor | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 11-06-2009 04:52 PM |
| Ebay auctions...increasing with fall upcoming? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 08-15-2007 05:44 AM |