|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nice card George
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dean/Zach: Thanks for the feedback. At one time I had a PSA 5 and an SGC 5.5, but neither of them could compete with this one, in my judgement. I was very happy when I was able to "upgrade" to this one and dispose of the other two.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Apologies for running this thread off track .
I have a nosy habit of looking up other peoples cards on PSA - I was curious why Jackie was only a two thinking there is back damage - The back’s beautiful just very light hints of aging |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was just trying to spruce up the thread a bit, but yes, the back is probably a little nicer than the front:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looks like a perfect example of a 3.5
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Jackie Leaf | LincolnVT | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 24 | 07-13-2023 12:08 AM |
| My Leaf Jackie for a 1952 Jackie | sniffy5 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-01-2022 09:30 PM |
| Perfectly centered and registered '48 Leaf Jackie Robinson, Dimaggio, '49 Jackie | Sean1125 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 05-24-2021 10:35 PM |
| WTB $15k for a PSA 2 Jackie 48 Leaf | notfast | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-16-2021 05:23 PM |
| Basic Differences of 1948 vs 1949 LEAF Sports Sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-14-2005 05:08 PM |