![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I am OK with almost all flaws and actually go out of my way to find cards that are way off center and have print flaws.
About the only thing that makes me pass on a card is damage to the players face area like paper loss or huge creases. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I find tilts and diamond-cuts very distracting and try to avoid them, even if they grade high.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ed, good to see you back at it again! I have loosened up a lot over the years. As someone who tries to build sets from the early 1950s, I can tell you that the cards aren't getting any cheaper. I prefer well centered cards, but if a common is OC, I can live with it so long as it's not MC. I used to toss out a card with a wrinkle. Now, I'm using binders again (been all over the place with that, too), and I figure a card with a wrinkle or a crease not on the face isn't going to make a big difference. I just want reasonable looking copies of cards. As I've gotten older, just completing sets has become the objective. I'm about 60ish% complete on four different sets. Two of them I'm rebuilding after having sold off the commons a while back. I used that money to buy some stars for some other sets. It's all working out, and I'm having fun.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've always been ok with flaws. The really bad ones get put into the box of printing errors.
I am thinking of working on fisheyes, which I've always considered to be very transient. That bit of stuff causing it could be there for one sheet, or 50. I've seen some here that must have stayed in the press for a long time. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Budget now dictates what I'm willing to collect. The cards that I'm looking to upgrade are: miscuts, tilt/diamond cuts, and creases. Some sets are pretty much "locked-in"
My 53 Bowman Color is in vg-ex overall, mostly due to centering. The funds aren't there for upgrades. 1967 p-vg/ex and 1968 Topps Baseball f- vg/ex- too many creased cards to fully upgrade 1969 Topps Baseball- g-vg (miscuts and creases) slowly upgrading it to vg to vg-ex condition 1970 Topps Baseball vg/ex- there are centering issues, and the Bench and Ryan are in vg condition 1971 Topps Baseball ex-mint overall. I'm upgrading the stars and hard to find commons that are centered in ex-mint condition. This set is my priority. 1972 Topps Baseball vg-ex+ to ex-mint. #695 Carew in in vg/ex condition and a number of the high numbers are off-centered or have a slight tilt. 1973 Topps Baseball vg-ex to ex-mint overall, Schmidt rookie is SGC 4.5. 1974 Topps Baseball ex-mint, need to upgrade the Yankees team card and one checklist. 1975 Topps Baseball ex-mint, Ryan is in ex condition. I've begun to collect the 1970 and 71 Topps Football sets. A number of the cards have a small pinhole with sharp corners. I would like to collect the stars in vg condition without creases or miscuts. Off to work now. Willing to trade to complete the football sets. Phil aka Tere1071 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1952 Topps red stripe cards. Still trying to get a complete set of them.
Last edited by Zach Wheat; 09-16-2025 at 08:48 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Print Flaws... It's Not Just About the $$$ | Pat R | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 12-30-2023 08:36 AM |
1968 Topps printing flaws question? | George Baseball | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 07-01-2021 06:16 PM |
70’s Set Collectors, which “flaws” are acceptable/unacceptable to you? | Vintagevault13 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 04-02-2019 08:05 PM |
What card flaws are acceptable for your PC? | Vintagevault13 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 21 | 11-25-2013 06:02 PM |
What flaws do you spot on this Ruth? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 86 | 04-23-2008 07:58 PM |