![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have to admit the post war sets I work on saw some insane prices in this auction. Good for the consignors I suppose.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The presented 1940 Play Ball example of Ted Williams has been extremely conservatively graded NM/MT 8 by the increasingly demanding graders at PSA. Never before have we ever offered a PSA 8 example of any card from any set with such an obvious abundance of decidedly above-grade features. Well-formed NM/MT+ bottom corners bow to superior MINT+ to GEM MINT top points between indubitably undeviating MINT edges around a sensationally MINT surface that displays a characteristically granular appearance completely devoid of any significantly extraneous print that wouldn't be tolerated on a MINT and perhaps even GEM MINT example. The contrast, that is, the relative difference between the lighter and darker areas of the image, is as strong as the sepia-toned print of the '40 Play Ball issue permits, while the thin lines encompassing Teddy's classic pose, as well as the nostalgic baseball-themed design girding the immaculate nameplate at bottom, show no breaks or skips, as they often do, and boast such tremendous saturation that they in fact appear black to the naked eye. The reverse text is equally as impressive, with noticeably bold registration and no perceivable fading or other common inadequacies indicative of the conservatively opined evaluation. Process of elimination brings us back to the front surface in search of a marginal deficiency responsible for the grade, but I still see no apparent faults, even with a 15x loop, that would exclude this pack-fresh blazer not just from a NM/MT+ 8.5 grade, but from a comfortable and clearly convincing fit in a MINT 9 holder. Is it the top-to-bottom centering? Is it not at least 35/65, the stipulated minimum tolerance for MINT 9? Or am I simply losing my mind after writing too many descriptions today? No, yes, and... probably! But, seriously, friends, any which way you inspect and admire this stimulating 1940 Play Ball example of "The Kid," its admirable condition can be summed up with one simple term, never before so appropriate and true: HIGH END! No, check that. This prized pasteboard is EXCEPTIONALLY HIGH END!
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
He said adverbly....
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Peter, I don't know what in the hell just happened but I read the above verbiage you posted and started feeling a bit dizzy. Next thing I know I'm on the ground with a bump on my head -- and my wallet was gone!
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I felt safe reading the whole thing because my wallet is already empty.
__________________
Looking for Nebraska Indians memorabilia, photos and postcards |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The reason the catalogs and descriptions go on forever is to give you something to read as the auction drags out until 5 in the morning.
![]() |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jeff there is no way you read that whole description before you got sick. Impossible.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That's nothing! The last auction I bid in (last month) didn't end until 0720 Central Time!!!!! ![]() Steve |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Most cards don't require much more than a few lines.
One paragraph on the background of the player One paragraph on the card's grade and if needed; an explanation of the importance of said condition. NOW; there are memorabilia pieces which require more detail as to explain WHY the piece exists may take a few paragraphs. Thus; for the average collector on this board; card descriptions are too long and mem descriptions need more detail. But we also have to remember; that not every collector knows what we DO about these cards. Rich |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I agree with Rich's final observation. I like longer and more detailed descriptions on some of the rarer cards and sets about which I know little more than their catalog designation. I also don't mind well-written, well-researched information on a player, especially if the information offered is something obscure. REA writes very long descriptions on some of their lots and I appreciate the information. As far as negatives, I especially would like to see less of the "this is so great for its grade" hype and more detailed explanation of the actual condition--like telling me which corner is weak, which I might not see in a scan. I can also do without the goofy synonyms, similes and metaphors. I feel like Leonard Pinth-Garnell when I read some of them: Welcome to Bad Auction Writing.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The problem is when you have to read 1,000 words before you first learn what is being sold. I once half-jokingly said an auction house should underline the first line of the object description, so those of us who wanted could skip the novella.
Last edited by drc; 10-07-2009 at 03:19 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lesson Learned | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 07-20-2008 09:00 AM |
Let's Rate The Auction Houses | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 51 | 06-01-2008 01:29 PM |
Suggestions for Auction Houses | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-17-2007 09:13 PM |
Lesson learned: thanks for everything guys it's not as bad as it looks | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 08-19-2007 05:54 PM |
A Lesson Learned (altered cards being slabbed) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-02-2007 11:52 AM |