|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's apparent that even prestigious auction houses are not doing their due diligence to determine whether or not certain items are real. There are so many knock off and downright counterfeit items in the marketplace that something like this doesn't surprise me. Of course, all he is entitled to is a refund, and maybe if he's lucky an apology. Suing for $7 million is ridiculous. I too am glad he lost.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
my 2 cents. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Due diligence? Comeon. If annyone has been keeping score lately, auction houses basically get away with whatever they can -- until they're caught. Even when the auction houses are caught they don't 'fess up. I remember earlier this year in Goodwin's auction he had a Cobb card listed as the only one graded by SGC. I proceeded to post my own, identical, SGC-graded card on the board. Slippery Bill immediately banned me from his auction -- but never changed the false 1 of 1 population claim in his listing.
Has anyone ever seen an industry in which such a large percentage of the population has either: been in prison, are about to be in prison or belong in prison? Auction house principals rest comfortably with the understanding that there are simply not enough prosecutorial resources to indict all of the bad guys in the hobby.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Whatever you do, don't point it out here (unless it's a small-timer on eBay or the B/S/T, then it's OK to go after them with both barrels blazing). But if it's a major auction house that's guilty of questionable practices, you'll find a parade of board members ready to march in defense whenever questions are raised.
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Obviously Rob is right. The ones that defend the certain auction house crooks can be divided into two categories: a) the hobbyists who are co-conspirators; or b) those too dopey to recognize the most obvious of frauds. I had an email exchange with a hobbyist the other night who in the most vociferous manner was certain that some of the most obvious fraud ever seen in an auction was just not that statistically significant. Of course, that I deal with fraudsters and fraud every day of my career was lost on this imbecile. But of course if an ebayer rips off a board member for $20 we'll get a three page thread with everyone in agreement as to how bad that fraud was.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
What has struck me in the past are collectors who complain about a fraudulent auction house then bid or consign in their auctions.
Last edited by drc; 12-24-2009 at 11:14 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Conducting auctions on the B/S/T | Adam | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 74 | 06-07-2009 03:20 PM |
| Legendary Auctions Acquires Assets of Mastro Auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 03-10-2009 08:33 PM |
| An open letter to SCP auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 07-16-2008 06:43 PM |
| Popularity of Web Auctions Helps Fuel Growth in Live Auction Industry | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-26-2007 09:29 AM |
| Robert Edward Auctions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 23 | 05-07-2004 12:55 PM |