NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
ebay GSB
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Main Forum - WWII & Older Baseball Cards > Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-16-2010, 10:20 AM
barrysloate barrysloate is offline
Barry Sloate
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 8,293
Default

True indeed. If the Standard Catalog were to change the date of a rookie card, so be it. But if a grading service changed it on the label, they might expect one or more irate phone calls down the road. But I agree, it is what it is.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-16-2010, 10:53 AM
Brian-Chidester Brian-Chidester is offline
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 148
Default

I'd personally like to see the T213-1 and T215-1 series' changed to T206 back variants. Don't know if that is a popular opinion or not, but it's certainly one that I consider a valid change.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-16-2010, 12:46 PM
ChiefBenderForever's Avatar
ChiefBenderForever ChiefBenderForever is offline
Johnny S
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lost in Connecticut
Posts: 1,261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian-Chidester View Post
I'd personally like to see the T213-1 and T215-1 series' changed to T206 back variants. Don't know if that is a popular opinion or not, but it's certainly one that I consider a valid change.
I think a major problem would be years issued, if they were issued in same years I could see it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-16-2010, 01:00 PM
Brian-Chidester Brian-Chidester is offline
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 148
Default

The first series' in the T213 and T215 were issued from 1910-1912.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2010, 01:03 PM
ChiefBenderForever's Avatar
ChiefBenderForever ChiefBenderForever is offline
Johnny S
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lost in Connecticut
Posts: 1,261
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian-Chidester View Post
The first series' in the T213 and T215 were issued from 1910-1912.
I didn't know that, learn something new everyday !
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-16-2010, 01:15 PM
Brian-Chidester Brian-Chidester is offline
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 148
Default

Yeah, and they have the same exact fronts as those of 68 other players from the regularly recognized T206 white borders set, even down to the font and color of the typeset. The only difference between the T206 cards and the T213-1 and T215-1 cards, apparently, is the paper stock. I've never owned a T215-1, so I can't speak to that, but the T213-1 cards are a lot thinner.

I'm sure there is an entire thread on this subject somewhere, but it would have existed before I started reading posts here.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-16-2010, 01:34 PM
Matt Matt is offline
Matt Wieder
member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 2,358
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian-Chidester View Post
Yeah, and they have the same exact fronts as those of 68 other players from the regularly recognized T206 white borders set, even down to the font and color of the typeset. The only difference between the T206 cards and the T213-1 and T215-1 cards, apparently, is the paper stock. I've never owned a T215-1, so I can't speak to that, but the T213-1 cards are a lot thinner.

I'm sure there is an entire thread on this subject somewhere, but it would have existed before I started reading posts here.
There are indeed several posts on the topic already. That change is different & much more controversial then those discussed here as that has to do with classification and not dates. The correct way to classify something is open to interpretation, dates are not.
__________________
To send me a Private Message, click here.
Please check out my albums.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2010, 01:34 PM
Leon's Avatar
Leon Leon is online now
Leon
peasant/forum owner
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: near Dallas
Posts: 35,868
Default not for me

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian-Chidester View Post
Yeah, and they have the same exact fronts as those of 68 other players from the regularly recognized T206 white borders set, even down to the font and color of the typeset. The only difference between the T206 cards and the T213-1 and T215-1 cards, apparently, is the paper stock. I've never owned a T215-1, so I can't speak to that, but the T213-1 cards are a lot thinner.

I'm sure there is an entire thread on this subject somewhere, but it would have existed before I started reading posts here.
First of all there are no other cards in T206 that are on as thin of stock as T213-1. I don't think it should be labeled as T206 because of that and because Burdick put Coupons in their own designation. For me, that's enough, though I am probably in the minority.

I have never really heard of T215-1 being classified as T206 nor very many arguments (unlike T213-1) thinking it should be. I am aware of at least 1 T215-1 that has a bit of a different background than it's T206 counterpart, that being Griffith batting. FYI, T215-1 is normal cardstock from what I remember. I have owned several but only own 1 now....regards
__________________
Leon Luckey
www.luckeycards.com
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Run of Trader Speaks from 1-1974 to 10-1983 - Auction ends Dec.30 at 10:00 PM EST jerrys Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. 0 12-26-2009 12:20 PM
Baseball - Vintage Type I Press Photos - 1930s-40s Ending Tonight Nov. 6th on Ebay D. Bergin Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T 3 11-06-2009 08:25 AM
2008-09 Japanese Baseball Card Checklist & Price Guide Archive Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T 1 08-13-2008 11:04 AM
Vintage baseball card Podcasts Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 0 03-09-2007 05:13 AM
Current Issue of The Vintage & Classic Baseball Collector Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 3 10-28-2001 02:01 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:16 AM.


ebay GSB