I'm almost POSITIVE this card features Shoeless Joe...

[brett]

Originally Posted by Kawika

Mark is no amateur in the field of photo identification, and his methodology is more rigorous than yours.

Disclaimer: I believe it is Jackson but my opinion is solely based on wishful thinking.

EXACTLY!!! In many cases the untrained eye is more acurate than a so-called expert's because they over-analyze things instead of just seeing what's right beneath their nose!

[Kawika]

What is beneath our noses is a blurry photo.
The newspaper photo maybe establishes that it is the same outfield fence.
There is no doubt in my mind that it might be Joe Jackson.

[sportscardtheory]

Originally Posted by Kawika

What is beneath our noses is a blurry photo.
The newspaper photo maybe establishes that it is the same outfield fence.
There is no doubt in my mind that it might be Joe Jackson.

So you agree that it's the same base? Does anyone know how many base-runners were thrown out stealing on that base during that game?

[brett]

Originally Posted by Kawika

What is beneath our noses is a blurry photo.
The newspaper photo maybe establishes that it is the same outfield fence.
There is no doubt in my mind that it might be Joe Jackson.

Riiiiiight... and there's no doubt in my mind that the sun might come up this morning.

[Kawika]

Brett: Give it a rest. Save the end zone dance for when you have a positive ID and not a laundry list of conjecture. Either way the Sun will surely rise in Honolulu in the morning; it might be beautiful and it might not be. And Lord might be tagging Jackson and he might not be.

[brett]

Originally Posted by Kawika

Brett: Give it a rest. Save the end zone dance for when you have a positive ID and not a laundry list of conjecture.

The dance started 2 days ago. It's him.

[Matt]

Originally Posted by brett

EXACTLY!!! In many cases the untrained eye is more acurate than a so-called expert's because they over-analyze things instead of just seeing what's right beneath their nose!