|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Varies by person. For me the list is:
1. N172 Anson in Uniform 2. Baltimore News Ruth 3. T210 Jackson I like the '52 Topps Mantle but it isn't in my top 50 Last edited by oldjudge; 01-02-2011 at 06:48 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I love the 1914 cracker jack Christy Mathewson.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Probably differs by collector, and by day, but for this collector on this day, a CJ Jackson can occupy the #3 spot. Although I'd change the top 2 as well...
Regards, Richard. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
The 1933 Goudey Lajoie would be in my top 3.
__________________
My collection: http://imageevent.com/vanslykefan |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
What about the m101 4/5 Ruth?
Last edited by vintagecpa; 01-02-2011 at 08:12 PM. Reason: M116 lol |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Red Cobb with Ty Cobb back.
__________________
craig_w67217@yahoo.com |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
This would be my number 3, followed by Balt News Ruth
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
If there was one it would be cool but he didn't play that early....maybe you mean M101-4/5?
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 01-02-2011 at 07:38 PM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
It's the details that kill you in this hobby. That is the rookie Ruth I was referring to. I guess for me, it would be #1.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Globally, your #1 is probably accurate, but from there it goes by taste. On a pre-WW2 vintage board, you'd probably not get overwhelming support for the '52 Topps Mantle being the #2 desirable card. It being the second most recognized globally might be a different discussion, though.
Truth be told, if I had a T206 Wagner, I'd sell it because it is so universally acclaimed in order to get cards that are more desirable to me. My point is that desirability is a personal choice. So, the question really is, "What is your #3?" |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
M101-4/5 is not Ruths rookie to some, I call the Balt New Ruth's rookie ![]() So If I was talking to you Id be confused right there |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A question regarding the Mastro trimmed card thread | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 10-02-2006 12:36 PM |
| I realize that our opinions may differ regarding what constitutes a baseball card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 09-10-2006 02:42 PM |
| POLL: Trimmed Card Prices | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 63 | 12-22-2005 10:06 AM |
| card sells in catalog auction...but still in dealer's showcase at shows | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 12-11-2005 04:42 PM |
| scan manipulation, the latest (at least to me) card scam | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-05-2002 05:09 PM |