|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
There are a lot of scenarios where a few (or even ONE) of these get factory cut and then the presses/cutters get stopped. Nobody will ever REALLY know... so I, for one, am going to trust SGC. I'm glass-half full. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
FWIW, I think it is a gorgeous card!! Last edited by gnaz01; 03-22-2012 at 07:49 AM. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
It is a great looking card, I think it would be revered in any of our collections.
I understand the "what signs", for me it was easy, that blue "Piedmont 150" on the back clued me in. That was the sign. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I am willing to give SGC the benefit of the doubt because they reviewed the card in hand, went over it very carefully, and were aware of the risk of labeling it with a numerical grade if they missed something. I do not believe that the management of the company would have gone forward without being as certain as possible of the qualities of the card. Do they miss things from time to time? Of course. But it is quite a stretch to say that they missed it on something as significant as the Plank card, at this time, in this age of scrutiny, with the money and reputation at stake as it is.
Jim also makes a very good point. Extrapolating from a few known examples to all examples in existence is an inclusion error that relies on an assumption that has not been validated. I have been proven wrong enough times in my collecting experiences that I won't classify something unusual unequivocally unless I have first-hand knowledge [like a 1971 partial blank back card that someone asked me about recently as perhaps being scrap rather than original--I pulled the card from a pack myself in 1971 so I know it was issued]. None of us were involved in the T206 printing process and we simply do not know what really happened. The fact that the few P150 Plank cards to emerge so far were handcut does not pre-empt the possibility that a card might have slipped into the actual mix of issued cards. Look at the error card threads of late; the crap that actually did get out is way more visibly wrong than a properly printed card, but it made it through quality control and into the packages. Wagner wasn't supposed to go out but a bunch did. I prefer to base my conclusions on what I see, not what I think I should see, and I do not have enough information to make a determination on the subject card. I'd need to see it in person and go over it the way SGC did.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 03-22-2012 at 12:02 PM. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"But it is quite a stretch to say that they missed it on something as significant as the Plank card"
Hi Adam! Welcome to the battle! Does this imply that the Green Cobb is insignificant? or that it is properly numerically graded in your opinion? thanks dan |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
How is putting the number on the Plank card any different than putting a number on strip cards, Bazookas, Oklahoma Today, or Esskay cards? According to Ted all of the Plank Piedmont 150s are hand cut, so this is just another case of a grading company putting a number on a handcut card.
Personally I think all handcut cards should be Authentic, but grading companies have decided to disagree with me. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I agree Dan, no hand cut cards should have numbers.
The difference here is that the companies admit the strip cards and such are hand cut because that is the only way they could be cut and were supposed to be cut. The T206 issue is supposed to be factory cut and the company is implying that this one is NOT hand cut. A significant difference I think |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
It would really be nice to have psa's opinion on this as well.....
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Note that there was another Cobb (Bat Off) in the same submission that was deemed Authentic (likely due to trimming). What did they see in the Bat Off that they missed in the Green? ![]()
|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That isn't an angle cut at the top left corner, that is a blatant dog ear'd cut. And yes an angle cut would be fine but the bottom edge would need a matching opposite angle cut. This wavey bottom edge on the Green Cobb is flat across. |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually, I could see these 2 being swapped! I could live with the bat off numerically and the Green Cobb is just mind boggling.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
i agree with you dan...with the top left and lower rt on that cobby as they appear...I believe it's trimmed.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not always true. As far as I can tell, there's nothing wrong with the bottom of this one:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 12-29-2013 at 07:13 PM. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Maybe Ted Z or Jim Rivera or Tim Cathey the T206 experts could chime in here but I don't think what you are showing can happen in the factory with what we know of the cutting process? dan Last edited by danmckee; 03-22-2012 at 01:19 PM. Reason: . to ? |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm not weighing in on whether the Magie, Plank or Cobb are trimmed, although I do have an opinion, but rather just pointing out that not all diamond/diagonal cuts which don't have a matching opposite border, are hand cut or altered. I might mention I have also seen (and once owned) a very nice orange background Tinker E98 which had a wicked diamond cut left border and a straight right border and it sailed through grading with an SGC 40grade as SGC recognized it was a factory miscut. |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
ಠ_ಠ
__________________
T206 gallery |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Where have all the T206 uncut sheets gone.... ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 73 | 01-21-2012 12:10 PM |
| My T206 Plank theory....and, what's your guess ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 112 | 02-08-2007 12:43 PM |
| t206 Plank and Magie | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-25-2006 01:33 PM |
| t206 Plank and Magie on ebay? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-15-2003 04:43 PM |
| Magie Error | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-17-2002 02:47 PM |