|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
You obviously believe revisionist history is always a negative, and that there are no benefits to reevaluation of the historical record. For instance, in 1930 Seattle newspapers discussed the "Seattle Royal Colored Giants", but when writing about the team in 2015, I typically refer to them as the "Seattle Royal Giants". Is that revisionist? Yes, but a way to discuss the topic without referencing and thereby emphasizing negative terminology of the day. It in no way diminishes understanding of the subject. Just my opinion, Ty
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Nickname Origin- Dots Miller | z28jd | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 04-04-2015 02:05 PM |
| Best Nickname Nominations: | clydepepper | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 75 | 07-14-2014 01:53 PM |
| Most Unique Player Nickname (O/T) | mintacular | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 65 | 01-09-2010 08:52 PM |
| WTB: E90-2 Clarke | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 02-01-2008 04:48 PM |
| Post Your Favorite 1940 Play Ball Nickname Card | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 10-23-2007 01:30 PM |