 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
03-22-2012, 12:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
For those who are sure it is trimmed:
SGC is standing behind their grading of this card as much as is humanly possible. So if you are sure it is trimmed, SGC must also realize that. Given that scenario, why would they stick their necks out like that? To date, they have allowed PSA to stand alone on a pedestal with their Wagner 8 debacle. Why would SGC take a chance at climbing up (down?) on that pedestal with them? Just curious what your thoughts are.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Where have all the T206 uncut sheets gone.... ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 73 | 01-21-2012 12:10 PM |
| My T206 Plank theory....and, what's your guess ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 112 | 02-08-2007 12:43 PM |
| t206 Plank and Magie | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-25-2006 01:33 PM |
| t206 Plank and Magie on ebay? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-15-2003 04:43 PM |
| Magie Error | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-17-2002 02:47 PM |
Threaded Mode