|
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Why does the card look more heavily cut on the back of the "flashing" Gehrigs than the front? It's because the back scan of the SGC version is slightly smaller than the back scan of the PSA version. That's why the lettering moves a little, too.
While I find all of the evidence of cleaning/brightening persuasive, let's be a little cautious about relying on two scans of purportedly the same card under different conditions. My guess is that SGC did not miss an obvious trim on the Gehrig. For instance, the SGC insert appears to fit snugly -- more so than the PSA holder does. I took the same back scan of the SGC Gehrig, and then magnified one slightly below. Note how the eye picks up the difference in the bottom border much more easily than anything else.
__________________
Galleries and Articles about T206 Player Autographs www.SignedT206.com www.instagram.com/signedT206/ @SignedT206 Last edited by T206Collector; 08-27-2013 at 02:20 PM. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ezzard Charles disgrace with pre-certification, when will it end? | travrosty | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 16 | 05-31-2013 04:58 PM |
| OT: Jason Whitlock disgrace | YankeeCollector | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 02-19-2012 09:14 PM |
| N28 Joseph Mulvey PSA 4 off to auction | Orions father | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 1 | 06-13-2010 12:03 AM |
| Where are the Joseph Hall Cabinets? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-09-2008 04:47 PM |
| Wanted 2 Buy: WW Gum Joseph McCarthy etc. | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-29-2007 11:09 PM |