NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Buy/Sell/Trade Section (must login, caveat emptor) > T206 cards B/S/T

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-19-2019, 03:20 PM
Luke's Avatar
Luke Luke is offline
Luke Lyon
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Seattle
Posts: 4,219
Default

Good luck with the sale, but it doesn't help your credibility to tell people that card would grade a 3 or 4. You may just not know that you're wrong, but everyone else on the forum knows you are. If you haven't sent any cards in to PSA in a few years and looked at the grades you received, it's probably best not to make any claims about what grade this card would get.

There's exactly 0.00% chance this card could get a 2.5 or better with those corners, assuming there was no alteration. I would take the the under on 1.75 personally.

It's a great card. No reason to lie or exaggerate to try and make it seem like more than it is.

Edited to add that I probably went a little harder than I needed to in the above post. The OP sent me a PM and said he was just comparing his card to another PSA 2 and his card looked better. That is certainly possible. This card could not get above a "2" because of the corners, but it's still a nice looking card. I have a bunch of PSA 2s with rounded corners that look great.
__________________
ThatT206Life.com

Last edited by Luke; 02-19-2019 at 03:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-19-2019, 03:52 PM
pokerplyr80's Avatar
pokerplyr80 pokerplyr80 is offline
je.sse @rnot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke View Post
Good luck with the sale, but it doesn't help your credibility to tell people that card would grade a 3 or 4. You may just not know that you're wrong, but everyone else on the forum knows you are. If you haven't sent any cards in to PSA in a few years and looked at the grades you received, it's probably best not to make any claims about what grade this card would get.

There's exactly 0.00% chance this card could get a 2.5 or better with those corners, assuming there was no alteration. I would take the the under on 1.75 personally.

It's a great card. No reason to lie or exaggerate to try and make it seem like more than it is.

Edited to add that I probably went a little harder than I needed to in the above post. The OP sent me a PM and said he was just comparing his card to another PSA 2 and his card looked better. That is certainly possible. This card could not get above a "2" because of the corners, but it's still a nice looking card. I have a bunch of PSA 2s with rounded corners that look great.
I have seen crazier things than a card that looks like this ending up in a 3 or 4 holder. From the 1 picture I've seen I agree 2 would be the most likely grade, assuming the card had not been altered.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-19-2019, 03:55 PM
xplainer's Avatar
xplainer xplainer is offline
Jimmy Knowle$
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 View Post
I have seen crazier things than a card that looks like this ending up in a 3 or 4 holder. From the 1 picture I've seen I agree 2 would be the most likely grade, assuming the card had not been altered.
It WAS altered. OP stated so.

Then, unaltered.

So, no, it has not been altered.

It is alterless.
Without alter.
It has no alter.

Last edited by xplainer; 02-19-2019 at 04:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-19-2019, 03:59 PM
pokerplyr80's Avatar
pokerplyr80 pokerplyr80 is offline
je.sse @rnot
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 3,915
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xplainer View Post
It WAS altered. OP stated so.

Then, unaltered.

So, no, it has now, not been altered.
Right I guess I should have said had it not been altered I would assume a grade of 2. Although given the context of the thread my meaning should have been clear from my previous post.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-19-2019, 04:04 PM
xplainer's Avatar
xplainer xplainer is offline
Jimmy Knowle$
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pokerplyr80 View Post
Right I guess I should have said had it not been altered I would assume a grade of 2. Although given the context of the thread my meaning should have been clear from my previous post.
I understand. Had it not...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-19-2019, 04:06 PM
vintagetoppsguy vintagetoppsguy is offline
D@v!d J@m3s
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 5,981
Default

To the OP, you should post a pic of yourself holding the card. It worked out well for this guy...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg wagner.jpg (67.0 KB, 438 views)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-19-2019, 04:23 PM
mrvster mrvster is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,294
Default Peter....

and all....


I have followed this card very close , like I said , for many years.....


CARD SHOULD BE GRADED AS "ALTERED"


reasoning:


once a card has been tampered with (beside trimming) "altered" by human or otherwise.......



first time:


card had been "altered" the first time when extensive coloring had been added, and especially around the ear.....some "paper"(I believe) was added...and other major altering items performed on the card....

second time:

card was "un altered" by "altering" it again being reversing the original restoration......


this is EXTREMELY unfortunate as now no one really knows truly how much this card has been worked on....


it breaks my heart to see a piece of history being tampered with extensively....

my friend and board member mike s has held this a few times...


if you are going to drop serious cash on something like this, original in any condition , is the way to go....because no one truly knows what has been done and undone to this card...

CARD IS 100 % ALTERED .....AUTHENTIC, BUT NONE THE LESS ALTERED
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-19-2019, 04:39 PM
MichelaiTorres83 MichelaiTorres83 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 94
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xplainer View Post
It WAS altered. OP stated so.

Then, unaltered.

So, no, it has not been altered.

It is alterless.
Without alter.
It has no alter.
I believe that the past tense of alter means at some point in the past it was changed, regardless of the change but I am an English teacher

Unaltered and unrestored are not words I would use.

It was altered to make it look better then altered again to attempt to make it look like it did before it was altered the first time.

2 times it was altered.

Last edited by MichelaiTorres83; 02-19-2019 at 04:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-19-2019, 05:56 PM
xplainer's Avatar
xplainer xplainer is offline
Jimmy Knowle$
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: North Florida
Posts: 1,628
Default

Sarcasim is hard to do in print. Sorry.

Last edited by xplainer; 02-19-2019 at 05:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1909-11 T206 Honus Wagner vs. 1911-16 Kotton Honus Wagner: Who Has More? Orioles1954 Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 39 08-29-2010 04:30 PM
WTB: T206 Honus Wagner mintacular Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T 5 05-04-2010 12:05 PM
T206 Honus Wagner at HOF Steve D Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 3 04-17-2010 10:00 AM
Honus Wagner T206 Archive Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions 1 11-07-2008 03:32 AM
t206 honus wagner psa 2 Archive Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T 22 05-26-2007 05:22 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:35 AM.


ebay GSB