 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11
05-31-2017, 04:47 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I can "swing both ways." Last night (see the May pickups thread) I bought three new Helmars--and a classic 1910 Red Sun. I go largely by aesthetics, old or new, so Helmars interest me a good deal. Could care less if they go up in value. It's funny that so many here will write, "by the card, not the holder," testify against such a focus on valuation, and then knock on Helmars. As far as I know, Charles has never promised that value will go up. Here's one of my latest, which is 3 X 6 and evokes old-time trolley ads: http://www.net54baseball.com/attachm...1&d=1496270864
Last edited by GregMitch34; 05-31-2017 at 05:05 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Don't be surprised if..... (HOF debate!) | jimivintage | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 62 | 09-03-2014 08:53 PM |
| PSA vs SGC...the definitive Debate!!! | ullmandds | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 139 | 06-29-2012 06:21 PM |
| HOF Debate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 01-17-2009 10:50 PM |
| Restoration debate | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 11-19-2006 01:24 PM |
| A Great Debate? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-22-2002 11:15 PM |
Threaded Mode