![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It took about 15 seconds for the database to load so that I could search it. However, the message saying that the database was loading and please be patient with the spinning icon was still present even after I was able to search in it.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Again, I'm calling bullshit. It does not load in 15 seconds. It takes minutes to load. The webpage itself loads, and a few dozen rows of cards might load in 15 seconds, but the full excel file is not loading in 15 seconds.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Let me guess. Only water was used, and there was nothing to disclose.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is a classic example of what I keep talking about over and over and over. Someone on a web forum calls out a card and posts inaccurate/manipulated images that do not actually represent what the card looks like or looked like, or in this case both. Then they post these doctored before vs after images to make it appear as though something has been done to a card which in fact has not been done to it (in this case the implication is clearly that some sort of chemical bleaching/ateration has occurred). And you bought it hook line and sinker, because hey, look at those images! Yet, in hand, the card itself clearly has off-white dirty borders and has not been bleached at all, as also evidenced by the more accurate scans posted above. The very scans that Tiffany originally found of the card yet intentionally ignored because they didn't fit her agenda.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 06-05-2024 at 01:54 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can call it whatever you want, but after about 15 seconds, there were rows from the database displayed. I then did Ctrl-F and searched for Williams and it showed a count of 97 and took me to the first example which was Billy Williams near the bottom of the list.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() Some people will never figure it out. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I doubt a simple soaking in water would remove a water stain like that.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
E.g. I work in IT Security & Integration Program Mgt. How do you think we learn to continuously protect our systems? Like the FBI, other companies, etc… we hire, attend lectures , & study former hackers to teach ourselves. We just don’t guess or reuse online posts. Like most things in life, need to study the opposition to learn. Last edited by tjisonline; 06-06-2024 at 03:46 PM. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
lol
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ebay Auth guarantee- buying 'raw' card | pawpawdiv9 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-16-2024 07:16 PM |
PSA Card Guarantee | benjulmag | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 83 | 10-02-2023 11:50 AM |
PWCC and Doctored Cards | tod41 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 07-29-2019 07:04 PM |
T206 Doctored Card Detection Kit Ideas....anyone think this would be a good idea | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 04-29-2005 01:39 PM |
Does this Gehrig look like a doctored reprint | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-12-2003 05:18 PM |