|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I only collect T206s and have submitted a few hundred to SGC in the past 18 months. I am pretty good about being able to determine what grade a card is going to get. I'd say 70-80% accurate to the grade given, and 98 percentish on being within one grade. That said, I typically submit cards that will yield a grade of 30-60.
Anyway, since I've been following this thread I decided to go back and look at SGCs grading scale (http://sgccard.com/grading_scale.htm). Based on the guidelines for each grade as listed on the page, I tend to agree that they are grading very harshly. Specifically, I'll point out:
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 11-17-2011 at 05:11 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm with Jay on this one...I collect lower-mid grade...and am super happy...I am very suspicious of most high grade cards that are over 100 years old.
If one were to create a short film documenting the life of a T206 card from the time it was pulled from a pack of cigs back in 1909...how boring would the film be if the instant the card was pulled it weas placed in between the pages of book where it stayed for 100 years...B-O-R-I-N-G!!!! I like my cards with a story!!!! On a different note...I think it's a lot easier to be consistent when it comes to grading T206's as there are so many of them out there to compare to. Granted there are size differences...but not nearly as high a % as some other types of cards...which exist in much smaller #'s and may be printed on different types of stock more prone to deterioration. It drives me crazy to open the SCD and look for prices of vintage cards only to find NRMT, EX, VG as options..when most cards available are in lesser grades...and practically none exist in these higher grades. Last edited by ullmandds; 11-17-2011 at 06:14 PM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is partially why I collect low-grade cards. I've never had a card that would grade a 2 or higher, so I don't have to worry about what the grade gets
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
What I look for in a card is eye appeal, which I believe gets overlooked at times by judging a card on grade alone. It seems and is fine with me that the card grading companies focus on the technical aspects of grading a card. I would not mind seeing a flip on the back of the card kind of like BVG in breaking down the surface,corner,centering,edges but with more descriptions maybe they could use a code system if a card is getting knocked a grade or two because of staining, creasing, paperloss etc.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
+1 to all points Ullmandds! |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Oaks Show and SGC | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-13-2011 04:35 PM |
| SGC On-Site Grading at Valley Forge Show Dec. 3-5, 2010 | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 12-02-2010 12:01 PM |
| SGC Accepting Submissions at Shriner's Show in Massachusetts this weekend! | spacktrack | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-05-2009 06:55 PM |
| SGC At The Philly Show | spacktrack | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 09-24-2009 11:52 AM |
| T-206 and SGC grading questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-07-2007 06:52 AM |